CBC Home

Inspections



618-560-9986



View inspection report





Client Testimonials

March 26, 2010

CBC Home Inspections

Christopher,

It’s not often that I experience exceptional customer service, so when I do, I feel strongly in expressing my appreciation. You were meticulous and never rushed in the inspection of my pending home. I found your report to be reader friendly, but also liked the extra information provided by way of pictures in problem areas. In addition, you took the time to research a couple of key critical equipment pieces by way of serial number. I have shared my experience with many people and will keep an ear open for anyone in the market for buying a home, as I will highly recommend your services. Thank you for making one aspect of my home buying experience a stress free event…for that I am very grateful!

Sincerely,

Tami Joyce

 

Wed. 11/25/2009
Chris, Everything has gone well. The inspection uncovered some serious concerns, such as the hidden exposed wiring and specific roof issues, that we were able to have addressed.
Was the report easy to read and understand? Too much, too little information?
 We were happy with the detail provided. The diagrams helped us to understand the problems significantly.
Do you feel I covered everything you were specifically concerned with and clearly explaining all defects with enough detail?
Yes.
Overall were you completely satisfied with the inspection, my ability, and the final report?
Indeed, we are completely satisfied.
If you have any questions or comments regarding anything you feel I did right, or wrong, please feel free to comment and let me know.
 Again, we felt it was quite thorough, and saved us time and headaches by allowing us to present serious problems before closing and before the occupancy inspection.
Would you hire me again and/or refer my service to your friends or family?
 Absolutely.

Thanks again.
John L. Moody

Sun, 1/11/09  5:06 PM

 I was so happy with Chris as a home inspector that I volunteered to write this testimonial.  Chris is extremely knowledgeable and thorough in his examination of a home.  I had him inspect a house that had been inspected months previously, and he found several important issues that had been missed in the earlier report.  He was alsovery willing to explain exactly what was wrong and its implications.  Chris was prompt, courteous and accommodating with scheduling.  His write-up was very thorough with great pictures.  I can't think of anything else I would ask for from an inspector.  I would recommend him without reservation to anyone who is in the process of buying a house.

Sincerely,

James Humphrey

 

Ocober 17, 2009I'm sorry for the delay in my reply; I've had trouble with my computer at home and really only get to read email at work. Thank you Christopher for the thorough inspection and for letting me make a nuciance of myself!  I closed on the house on November 25'th and hope to be settled in time to decorate for Christmas. Two city inspectors came out to check the main beam in the basement.  One didn't say too much about it, but the other inspector said it looked undersized to him. I'm planning on getting some estimates as well as reading as much as I can about this sort of thing.  We'll see how it goes. Thanks again!  If anyone I know needs a home inspection I'll be sure to send them your way. 'Jill

Sent: Mon Sept. 29. 2008.

Thanks for the follow-up Chris, sorry to get back with you so late. If you remember we had to go out of town next day. No problems with the report. We were able to get the builder to fix some things. When I need you again I’ll be sure to contact you.Sincerely, Heath **akstis

Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2009 8:32 AM

Thank you for doing the inspection on Logan . It was very thorough and informative. It really opened my eyes as to the condition of the property.  I will make sure the next time I need an inspection that I will call you.  Mary Elvarez
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2009 9:17 PM
Hi Christopher--Gary and I just returned from our vacation and received your telephone call.  Thanks for your followup call  Your report was very helpful to us in our decision-making and we're glad we chose you as our inspector. You did a thorough job.  We'll make sure to send you the feedback in writing on the form you gave us.  (We've just been a little busy lately. Again Christopher, we appreciate all you did for us in helping us with this big decision.  I wish every inspector took the time to educate his clients like you did with us.  If I know of anyone needing an inspector, I'll certainly highly recommend you. Thanks!!!!!!!! Angela and Gary





Electromagnetic Fields In The Home

ElectroMagnetic Fields

Can the electric and magnetic fields (EMF) to which people are routinely exposed cause health effects? What are sources of EMFs, and when are EMFs dangerous?

EMF (or ElectroMagnetic Field) is a broad term which includes electric fields generated by charged particles in motion, and radiated fields such as TV, radio, hair dryer, and microwaves. Electric fields are measured in units of volts per meter or V/m. Magnetic fields are measured in milli-Gauss or mG. The field is always strongest near the source and diminishes as you move away from the source. These energies have the ability to influence particles at great distances. For example, the radiation from a radio tower influences the atoms within a distant radio antenna, allowing it to pick up the signal. Despite the many wonderful conveniences of electrical technology, the effects of EMF on biological tissue remains the most controversial aspect of the EMF issue, with virtually all scientists agreeing that more research is necessary to determine safe or dangerous levels.

Research since the mid-1970s has provided extensive information on biological responses to power-frequency electric and magnetic fields. The Electric and Magnetic Fields (EMF) Research and Public Information Dissemination (RAPID) Program was charged with the goal of determining if electric and magnetic fields associated with the generation, transmission, and use of electrical energy pose a risk to human health. The fact that 20 years of research have not answered that question is clear evidence that health effects of EMF are not obvious and that risk relationships, if risk is identified, are not simple. Because epidemiologic studies have raised concerns regarding the connection between certain serious human health effects and exposure to electric and magnetic fields, the program adopts the hypothesis that exposure to electric or magnetic fields under some conditions may lead to unacceptable risk to human health. The focus of the program is not only to test, as far as possible within the statutory time limits, that hypothesis for those serious health effects already identified, but to identify as far as possible the special conditions that lead to elevated risk and to recommend measures to manage risk.

Electromagnetic hypersensitivity (ES) is a physiological disorder characterized by symptoms directly brought on by exposure to electromagnetic fields. It produces neurological and allergic-type symptoms. Symptoms may include, but are not limited to, headache, eye irritation, dizziness, nausea, skin rash, facial swelling, weakness, fatigue, pain in joints and/or muscles, buzzing/ringing in ears, skin numbness, abdominal pressure and pain, breathing difficulty, and irregular heartbeat. Those affected persons may experience an abrupt onset of symptoms following exposure to a new EMF such as fields associated with a new computer or with new fluorescent lights, or a new home or work environment. Onset of ES has also reported following chemical exposure. A concerted effort to provide scientifically valid research on which to base decisions about EMF exposures is under way, and results are expected in the next several years. Meanwhile, some authorities recommend taking simple precautionary steps, such as the following:

  • Increase the distance between yourself and the EMF source sit at arms length from your computer terminal.
  • Avoid unnecessary proximity to high EMF sources dont let children play directly under power lines or on top of power transformers for underground lines.
  • Reduce time spent in the field turn off your computer monitor and other electrical appliances when you arent using them.

The Office of Technology Assessment of the Congress of the United States recommends a policy of prudent avoidance with respect to EMF. Prudent avoidance means to measure fields, determine the sources, and act to reduce exposure.

  1. Detect EMFs in your home and work environment. It is good to know where the sources of EMF are in your everyday world and how strong these sources are. Is there wiring in the wall behind your bed that you dont even know about? Is the vaporizer emitting strong fields in the babys room? How much EMF are you and your family getting from the power lines in the street? Even hair dryers emit EMFs. Home inspectors often have meters to measure EMFs, or they can be purchased and shared with friends.
  2. Diminish your exposure to the EMFs you find. Determine how far you must stay away from the EMF emitters in your home and work environment to achieve less than 2.5 mG of exposurethe microwave oven, the alarm clock, the computer, and so on. Rearrange your furniture (especially the beds, desks, and couches where you spend the most time) away from heaters, wiring, fluorescent lights, electric doorbells, and other EMF hot spots. Where practical, replace electric appliances with non-electric devices. Where practical, replace electric appliances with non-electric devices. Have an electrician correct faulty high EMF wiring and help you eliminate dangerous stray ground currents. Consult a qualified EMF engineer if necessary. Contact National Electromagnetic Field Testing Association at 1-847-475-3696 for consultants in your area.
  3. Shield yourself. Use shielding devices on your computer screen and cellular phone. Add shielding to your household wiring, circuit box, and transformers.

Electric fields in the home, on average, range from 0 to 10 volts per meter. They can be hundreds, thousands, or even millions of times weaker than those encountered outdoors near power lines. Electric fields directly beneath power lines may vary from a few volts per meter for some overhead distribution lines to several thousands of volts per meter for extra high voltage power lines. Electric fields from power lines rapidly become weaker with distance and can be greatly reduced by walls and roofs of buildings.

Magnetic fields are not blocked by most materials. Magnetic fields encountered in homes vary greatly. Magnetic fields rapidly become weaker with distance from the source.

The chart on the left summarizes data from a study by the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) in which spot measurements of magnetic fields were made in the center of rooms in 992 homes throughout the United States. Half of the houses studied had magnetic field measurements of 0.6 mG or less, when the average of measurements from all the rooms in the house was calculated (the all-room mean magnetic field). The all-room mean magnetic field for all houses studied was 0.9 mG. The measurements were made away from electrical appliances and reflect primarily the fields from household wiring and outside power lines.

If you are comparing the information in this chart with measurements in your own home, keep in mind that this chart shows averages of measurements taken throughout the homes, not the single highest measurement found in the home.

Magnetic fields close to electrical appliances are often much stronger than those from other sources, including magnetic fields directly under power lines. Appliance fields decrease in strength with distance more quickly than do power line fields.

The graph shows magnetic fields produced by electric blankets, including conventional 110-V electric blankets as well as the PTC (positive temperature coefficient) low-magnetic-field blankets. The fields were measured at a distance of about 2 inches from the blankets surface, roughly the distance from the blanket to the users internal organs. Because of the wiring, magnetic field strengths vary from point to point on the blanket. The graph reflects this and gives both the peak and the average measurement.